Seok-Hyun, Ga
과학교육 & 컴퓨터과학

사용성(Usability)에 대한 준거

Seok-Hyun Ga 미분류 2022년 10월 6일
(Shneiderman et al., 2009)learnability, efficiency, memorability, number of errors, user satisfaction
(International Organization for Standardization, 1996) suitability for the task, controllability, suitability for individualization, error tolerance, suitability for learning, conformity with user expectations, and self-descriptiveness  
(Holcomb & Tharp, 1991)functional, user control, natural and intuitive, feedback, user help, consistent, and minimal memorization;
(Ravden & Johnson, 1989)appropriate functionality, flexibility and control, error prevention and correction, compatibility, information feedback, user guidance and support, consistency, visual clarity, and explicitness;
(Scapin, 1990)user explicit control, adaptability, error management, compatibility, guidance, consistency, user workload, and significance of codes.
(Park & Hwan Lim, 1999)Suitability for the task (appropriate functionality) The system should meet the needs and requirements of users when carrying out tasks. User Control (controllability, user explicit control) The system should be designed to let users control the interface as much as possible. Flexibility (suitability for individualization, adaptability) The interface should be sufficiently flexible in structure, in the way information is presented and in terms of what the user can do, to suit the needs and requirements of all users. Error Management (error tolerance, error prevention and correction) The system should be designed to minimize the possibility of user errors, with built-in facilities for detecting and handling those which do occur. Compatibility (conformity with user expectations, natural and intuitive) The way the system looks and works should be compatible with user conventions and expectations. Self-descriptiveness (information feedback, user guidance and support) Information feedback, guidance and support should be provided to help the user understand and use the system. Consistency (consistency in location, format, syntax, and naming) The way the system looks and works should be consistent at all times. User workload (minimal memorization, brevity, mental load) The system should be designed to keep the user’s mental load (particularly memory load) within acceptable limits and to increase the speed of interaction by increasing brevity.
(Kalawsky, 1999)Part 1 Functionality The interface should be able to provide the level of functionality (control) the user expects in order to complete a task Part 2 User input The user should be able to interact with and control the virtual environment in a natural manner Part 3 System output (Display) Information displayed to the user should be understood, unambiguous and necessary to complete the task Part 4 User guidance and help The user should be able to request help via online assistance Part 5 Consistency The operation of a VR system should be consistent with the user’s understanding and convention Part 6 Flexibility The VR system should not constrain the user who should be able to interact with the system in a flexible manner Part 7 Simulation fidelity In order to be useful a VR system needs an underlying model or simulation to control the virtual environment. Part 8 Error correction/handling and robustness All computer systems should provide error correction and recovery before a permanent change is made Part 9 Sense of immersion/Presence A VR system should allow a user to feel part of (or immersed in) a virtual environment Part 10 Overall system usability Overall a VR system should be intuitive and easy to use
(Nassar, 2012) reviewConsistency, user control, ease of learning, flexibility, error management, reduction of excess, visibility of system status
(Frøkjær et al., 2000)Effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction

Frøkjær, E., Hertzum, M., & Hornbæk, K. (2000). Measuring usability: Are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated? Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332455

Holcomb, R., & Tharp, A. L. (1991). What users say about software usability. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 3(1), 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447319109525996

International Organization for Standardization. (1996). Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Part 10: Dialogue principles (ISO Standard No. 9241-10:1996). https://www.iso.org/standard/16882.html

Kalawsky, R. S. (1999). VRUSE—a computerised diagnostic tool: For usability evaluation of virtual/synthetic environment systems. Applied Ergonomics, 30(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00047-7

Nassar, V. (2012). Common criteria for usability review. Work, 41, 1053–1057. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0282-1053

Park, K. S., & Hwan Lim, C. (1999). A structured methodology for comparative evaluation of user interface designs using usability criteria and measures. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 23(5), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(97)00059-0

Ravden, S., & Johnson, G. (1989). Evaluating usability of human-computer interfaces: A practical method. Halsted Press.

Scapin, D. L. (1990). Organizing human factors knowledge for the evaluation and design of interfaces. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 2(3), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447319009525981

Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M., & Jacobs, S. (2009). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction.

About: Seok-Hyun Ga

53 thoughts on “사용성(Usability)에 대한 준거”

  5. Say hello to SablierтАФthe leading platform for token streaming and vesting. Whether youтАЩre using Sablier token streaming for payroll, exploring Sablier vesting schedules, or claiming from a Sablier Airdrop Claim, itтАЩs all powered by Sablier Labs and the advanced Sablier API. Wondering how secure it is? The verified Sablier audit speaks for itself. Use your Sablier bonus code and start streaming at https://sablier.cc today!

    응답

  14. Exploring DeFi? Compound is changing the game with powerful Compound Finance tools designed for real results. Through the Compound app, users enjoy smart Compound lending, easy Compound borrowing, and competitive Compound interest rates. The Compound protocol is built on transparency, using Compound cTokens and driven by Compound governance. Want to grow your earnings? With high Compound APY and support for Compound Finance staking, you’re in control. Curious about Compound Finance review? Users love the security and reliability. Try it now—Compound Finance login at http://compound.ad and take charge of your Compound crypto journey today!

    응답

답글 남기기

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다